Lexington

Public University Trustees Move Forward with Privatization Plans for Housing

one comment
February 22, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

The University of Kentucky’s Board of Trustees signed off on the plan to privatize the public university’s student housing. Ms. Blackford of course has all the details, including but not limited to:

EdR vice president Tom Trubiana said his company is accepting low returns on the first dorm “because we wanted to be part of UK for the long term.”

“The uniqueness here is potentially that we could be the sole-source housing for UK for the future,” Trubiana said. “That’s why it absolutely needs to be a home run.”

Cool. A home run! This deal isn’t a single or a bases clearing double or even a ground rule double. It’s a home run!

Or it needs to be one. Continuing

If UK and EdR agreed to build a theoretical $10 million dorm, a financial model presented on Tuesday shows that UK would get $239,000 in revenue during the first year of the deal, and EdR would bring in about $239,000. However, the model shows that EdR would not start to make a profit until year 11 of the deal. By year 50, UK would make almost $2 million a year, and EdR would make $1.1 million, an 11 percent profit.

UK and EdR are deciding whether they will pursue an exemption from property taxes on the new dorm. Those taxes are built into EdR’s rates of return, Trubiana said.

“Any benefit would go to UK students in the form of lower rents,” he said.

1) Why would you lower rents when you could make more money? That’s bad business sense.

2) What are the guarantees behind that statement? Is it in the contract?

3) Why does EdR feel no responsibility to the community it seeks to profit off of?

4) Why does the University feel no responsibility to contribute to the upkeep and safety and well being of the city in which it exists?

As Blackford reported the other day:

Property taxes are divided by school systems, city governments and state government, with the majority going to public schools.

Fayette County taxes about 1 percent of a property’s assessed value. Approximately 68 percent of that goes to Fayette County Schools, 13 percent goes to the state, 9 percent goes to the city, 3 percent goes to the public health department, and 7 percent goes to LexTran. Less than 1 percent goes to UK extension services and soil- and water-conservation programs.

Lexington’s PVA David O’Neill estimates the proposed dorm could pay out $280K per year in property taxes.

Poor big businesses and their big tax burden. If corporations are in fact individuals, then should they really be granted tax relief individuals would never get?

In what world could you stop paying your property taxes?

Wouldn’t that be nice? Don’t you give enough back to the community as it is, just by being you?

Here’s another idea: Stop charging homeowners who live in the neighborhoods bordering the UK campus property tax.

If they don’t have to pay their property taxes, these homeowners could invest the money in a scholarship fund or something to reduce student costs and make college cheaper for the kids.

Because they would. They really would.

****

Read more Blackford.

Read UK’s Press Release.

Read Education Realty Trust’s Press Release.

Buy your EDR stock now!

And read the ground lease draft (PDF). Some highlights:

(b) Commercial Tenants shall occupy the Premises pursuant to a written lease, license or sublease (each, a “Permitted Commercial Lease” and together with the Permitted Residential Leases, the “Permitted Leases”). The terms of all Permitted Commercial Leases shall comply with the Requirements, and all Permitted Commercial Leases shall be on forms approved by Landlord, in its reasonable discretion; provided that Permitted Commercial Leases (i) shall provide that in the event that such Permitted Commercial Lease is assigned to Landlord or this Lease is terminated, Landlord shall have the right to terminate such Permitted Commercial Lease if necessary to ensure that the Premises are exempt from property taxes when owned by Landlord and in compliance with applicable law relating to tax exempt financing and (ii) may provide that such right is subject to payment by Landlord of a reasonable early termination fee.

and…

Section 8.01 Taxes. Tenant shall pay and discharge punctually when due all taxes, any payments in lieu of taxes, assessments, water and sewer rents, rates and charges, vault license fees or rentals, levies, license and permit fees and all other governmental impositions and charges of every kind and nature whatsoever, extraordinary as well as ordinary, foreseen and unforeseen, which shall be charged, levied, laid, assessed, imposed upon, become due and payable out of or in respect of, or become liens upon the whole or any part of the Premises, together with all interest and penalties, under all present or future laws, ordinances, requirements, orders, directives, rules or regulations or the federal, state, county, and city governments and of all other governmental authorities whatsoever as well as and including all payments in lieu of any of the foregoing (the “Taxes”). With the prior written consent of Landlord, in the Landlord’s sole and absolute discretion, Tenant may, at its sole cost and expense, seek a tax abatement or other tax exemption for the Premises. At the option of Landlord, the savings obtained as a result of any tax abatement will either serve to reduce the rent charged to the Residential Residents of the Premises or increase the Rent to the University.

also…

Section 8.05 Right to Refund of Taxes. Any savings, credits, refunds or rebates obtained as a result of any tax abatement or other tax exemption being obtained for the Premises shall belong to Landlord and be allocated in accordance with Section 8.01. Any refunds or rebates of the Taxes paid by Tenant shall belong to Tenant and be used in Tenant’s sole discretion.

Section 8.06 Separate Parcel. If necessary or advisable, Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant’s efforts to cause the Premises to be subdivided or re-subdivided to establish the Land and the Improvements as a separate tax parcels.

And some financials…

Share

Hide your wife, hide your kids, because nobody’s safe outside the pedways

no comments
February 20, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Last week the Webbs’ released their new CentrePointe design. Or, not really new but refashioned — it’s a Studio Gang design stripped of some of its power but better than what the Webbs kept coming up with on their own.

One part of Beverly Fortune’s really fantastic article we didn’t get around to mentioning on Thursday — because it deserves more than passing mention — was Dudley Webb’s pedway vision:

Several members took issue with a pedway shown connecting the hotel to the Financial Center parking garage. It would be possible for people to walk from the CentrePointe hotel all the way to the Lexington Center via pedways.

Board member Kevin Atkins asked whether that worked against the current push to get more people walking downtown. Last summer the city completed a multi-million-dollar, three-year project to build new sidewalks on Main Street, Vine Street and South Limestone.

Dudley Webb said that when women had to walk from the Lexington Center to the CentrePointe hotel at night, they would feel safer walking in pedways.

There are two points to discuss here.

The first is Dudley’s idea that pedways are good design.

The second is his hilarious (or, if you want to be angry — craaazy) views on safety.

Let’s start with the design element.

We here at B&P have long advocated for MORE PEDWAYS. Like the cowbell is to music, so too is the pedway to our urban-county fabric. Time and again, we have called for pedways in our time, even going so far as to google bomb Lexington, effectively turning us into the Pedway Capital of the World (regardless of the fact Louisville is now looking to build a significantly longer track — a classic example of that sad city’s Lexington-envy). As written in these pages in 2010, the Webbs are building a pedway to heaven:

Sure, “CentrePointe” does not yet exist and its current business plan – a hotel twice as expensive as the competition achieving occupancy rates well above the city’s current average – makes absolutely no sense. And the fifty million dollar condos aren’t exactly a hot commodity.

But Jim Newberry and the Family Webb know something the rest of us do not. They have a secret weapon.

It is the power of the Pedway.

As we have detailed over and over, the CentrePointe project as a whole is laughable: high on ego, short on funding, mindless in design, lacking in brains, etc.

But its Pedway system… oh, the CentrePointe Pedway system is genius. We hope this thing gets built some magical day in the future just because of the heavenly Pedways it offers the well-healed citizens of this fair city.

You see, even if the CentrePointe monstrosity sits essentially empty and serves no purpose for the vast majority of Lexington’s citizens – it will still have the Pedways!

Like Festival Market, Victorian Square, the Big Blue Building, the “World Trade Center” and the “Radisson” hotel before it, if there is one thing the Webb Company knows how to do… it’s build Pedways.

Images courtesy of Clarke.

So we are not opposed to the pedways. Webbs idea to build a pedway from his latest CentrePointe project to his parking garage is fine with us — it’s brilliant. We personally advocated this to Woodford Webb last summer when the Webbs brought in Jeanne Gang and listened to her bizarre pedwayless plans. In fact, we want the Webbs to go even further. To build another pedway from the parking garage at Park Plaza and the Public Library above Phoenix Park and across Limestone into the CentrePointe blocke. This would allow one to walk on air from the center of downtown all the way to its western end. This is genius.

Now, some would say that Jeanne Gang is a “genius.” But she said pedways were bad design. So did the Rupp Area master planner. And so did the Court House Area Design Review Board.

But what do they know?

Dudley Webb knows pedways.

And he knows that not only are they good design, they are a public safety imperative.

There is a lot of violence on Lexington’s downtown streets with people being attacked at all hours of the day by murky forces of evil.

Our streets are not safe. Our women are not safe.

Dudley Webb said that when women had to walk from the Lexington Center to the CentrePointe hotel at night, they would feel safer walking in pedways.

This is true.

It is true even though every single woman I have spoken with finds it offensive. And it is true even if every single person I have spoken with thinks it’s stupid or totally disconnected from reality.

The thing about the downtown Lexington pedway track is that much of what it connects are well-designed Webb family structures.

Should Webb’s latest pedway stand (and it should!) it would stretch above McCarthy’s, into the Big Blue Building parking lot, through the building, across Mill into the World Trade Center to the Radisson (or whatever) across to Festival Market and over Broadway to Victorian Square then all the way down to the empty condos and across to the Lexington Center at which point it circles back through to Kentucky Central (or whatever) and back into the Radisson.

This is about the safest route any woman would want to take late at night.

Put another way: Any woman who wouldn’t take this route is taking her fate into her own hands. Or feet.

The streets are dangerous. Anyone who has ever walked from one place to another in downtown Lexington and gotten there quickly, directly and without incident understands this.

The pedways hold many advantages.

1) The pedways are isolated. People don’t use them, they are generally deserted. Assuming that no criminal elements are there, you are unlikely to come across any witnesses or anyone who might hear you scream.

2) The places the pedways connect are isolated. There is very little foot traffic in the parking garages late at night. It’s a good place for someone to hide in a car, or between them, and there’s few passersby to contend with. The long empty hallways inside the empty buildings the pedways connect are winding and contain many blind corners. There is safety in not knowing what is hiding around the bend. You cannot find this safety on the open street level where, for the most part, you can see both in front and around you.

3) No one will hear you scream. On the street, people make noise and they holler at each other and cars drive by and people wave and laugh and sometimes some jackass vomits or two meat heads hit each other while large groups of people remain in total safety in the places around them. Inside the pedways, none of this awfulness can happen. That means you — man or lady, it doesn’t matter — can get good and sauced and wander all throughout the Lexington pedway system singing your brains out. You can scream songs at the top of your lungs crossing over Main or Broadway, and no one will hear you. You can chant and drum and, because there is no one around, no one will stop you or come to your harmonic aid.

Let us sing.

There’s a Dudley who’s sure
All that glitters is gold
And he’s buying a Pedway to heaven

When he gets there he knows
If the hotels are all closed
With a word he can get what he paid for

Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh
And he’s buying a Pedway to heaven…

Share

WKYT visits CentrePointe architects, and other takes

no comments
February 20, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Missed this, from WKYT:

Also, see Tom Eblen’s Sunday column on the subject:

I will admit to suffering a bit of CentrePointe fatigue when I went to see a preview of the fifth iteration of Dudley Webb’s still-unfunded downtown hotel, retail, office and condo development. But it was worth the trip.

I liked the designs that were shown informally Wednesday to the Courthouse Area Design Review Board, which must approve them.

Most of all, I realized how valuable this long and difficult process has been. Not only has it improved CentrePointe’s design — assuming the project is ever built — but it has taught Lexington some valuable lessons about the value of good design and public engagement.

And if you’re not done, there’s always The Streetsweeper:

From the wanna-be Frank Lloyd Wright’s to the “anything built in the ’80s is bad” crowd, they all showed up and it was off to the races.

Some folks think that Dudley is just trying to ruin the city’s reputation, others that the Webbs are truly criminal for stealing the wonderful vibrancy of the block’s former self. Four years (and one deep recession) into the project, some believe that if they bring enough criticism that they can delay the outcome until they can influence a change of design. Others still long for the memories of a once popular music venue and little else on a downtown block which was mainly vibrant after dark and basically stagnant during the day.

Share

Downtown Master Plannner speaks tonight, Feb. 20th @ 6PM

no comments
February 20, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

via ProgressLex:

Main author of Downtown Master Plan to speak at Lafayette Seminar, this Monday, 2/20!

The first session, featuring Dhiru Thadanithe principle author of Lexington’s Downtown Master Plan, and one of America’s most distinguished planners, will be THIS MONDAY, FEB. 20, 6 P.M. in PATTERSON A-B ROOM, THE HYATT REGENCY HOTEL, 401 West High Street. Councilmember Tom Blues, Chair of the Design Excellence Task Force, will respond, and give an update on the work of the Task Force. As new and exciting plans emerge for the CentrePointe block and the Rupp/ Arts and Entertainment District, it is especially important to remind ourselves of, and update our thinking about, the Downtown Master Plan, probably the most extensive downtown planning exercise that Lexington has ever experienced, with hundreds of citizen and professional participants. Many of its recommendations have been implemented, and more are in the process of implementation.

(If that doesn’t sound like fun to you, there’s also LexArts’ great 21 Nights Happy Hour series starting at 5p… so do as you will.)

Share

“Ultimately, the university’s desire is to be fair to everyone involved — local and state governments, the university and, most importantly, students.”

no comments
February 20, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

From Ms. Blackford’s must-read story on the UK dorm deal:

Under the contract for the first dorm, UK and EdR would sign a 50-year ground lease, meaning that UK still owns the land but the new building would be owned by EdR.

EdR would construct the $26 million dorm, financing it with its own cash and equity. UK would put up no capital in the deal, which was important to them because of the need to issue debt on academic buildings. Rating agencies such as Moody’s have been somewhat vague about whether these kinds of projects might eventually be held against the school’s credit rating.

Once the dorm was up and running, UK would receive 10 percent of gross revenues. After EdR receives a 9 percent rate of return from rents, then UK would get 25 percent of the net income. At the same time, EdR would receive a 4 percent management fee for operations in addition to the remaining net income.

That deal’s coming down on Tuesday.

There’s a lot of cheerleading going on, what a deal. Turns out UK decisions to spend decades not building dorms and investing that money elsewhere was a solid business decision. See green!

Corollary, from Ms. Blackford: UK’s decision to lease the ground to a private company (in the best interests of the students, of course, not the bottom line) does come with a significant silver lining:

As a government entity, UK doesn’t pay property taxes. But once the school enters into a ground lease with Education Realty Trust, any new dorms would probably be considered private property that is subject to taxation.

“I intend to put those buildings on the tax rolls,” said David O’Neill, the Fayette County Property Valuation Administrator. “UK and other government-owned properties are tax-exempt but, since they are signing a ground lease to another company, my position is, the company would have to pay taxes.”

UK officials said they hope EdR would not have to pay property taxes because the increased cost would probably be passed on to students.

Beautiful.

You really have to give UK credit.

Also especially enjoyable:

“We had a very positive discussion with the PVA as part of our efforts to keep everyone informed about this important issue,” [UK spokesman Jay] Blanton said. “As to property valuation and assessment, we’re still studying what the potential impact would be. Ultimately, the university’s desire is to be fair to everyone involved — local and state governments, the university and, most importantly, students.”

Love it.
Share

Webbs’ latest CentrePointe architects, EOP, release more design details

2 comments
February 16, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Following the news of the most recent CentrePointe design (H-L, B&P), the architects at EOP have released more details and a couple new images. Here’s the glass shard building, an Urban Active:

And here’s what they have to say about the project as a whole:

EOP’s design builds on the master plan presented by SGA and includes a 28-story tower consisting of a Marriott hotel on the lower floors and condominiums, pied-a-terres and two-story penthouses on the upper floors; an elevated expansive outdoor public space with sculpture garden, terrace and pool; an 8-story wedged office building with a Saul Good restaurant; a 3-story signature building for Jeff Ruby’s Steakhouse and Urban Active Fitness; plenty of underground parking; and 3- and 4-story buildings along Main Street designed by other local architecture firms. The Main Street buildings will be a mixture of two-story townhouses and one-story flats above street level retail in varying heights and materials.

So again, it’s like the Gang plan without Gang and replacing the Tower of Tubes with what one might imagine is the somewhat uninspired demands of Marriott for their promised hotel (which is not truly terrible like the Webbs’ initial forays). The plan maintains Gang’s vision of a non-monolithic monstrosity, the same ten story office structure and the three story restaurant/gym, along with the refashioned Main Street. Which looks like this:

They’ll be back soon, they pledge, for a public meeting to present the whole plan to the people, and will be joined by the local design firms working on those Main Street structures.

[For more reactions to this latest Webb attempt, visit the Kaintuckeean.]

Share

CentrePointe is back with a brand new invention!

5 comments
February 16, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Well that only took four months.

Back in October when Dudley and fam fired the worldclass architect they’d hired to reinvent their dead block they said they’d have a new plan in three weeks.

The Herald reported at the time:

Webb hired Lexington firm EOP Architects to incorporate Gang’s ideas into a design for the block. EOP already was involved with the project as one of Gang’s guest firms.

“We are excited to be able to take a great vision in terms of the master plan and move forward with it,” EOP’s Rick Ekhoff said Thursday. He said he hoped to make the EOP plan public in two to three weeks.

We last checked in six weeks later. EOP and the Webbs had remained silent, no new designs, no word, no action. Just a four year old “Coming Soon” sign.

But seasons change. And the CentrePointe rises again! At least on paper:

The view from Vine, between Upper and Mill.

The Webbs hung out with the Court House Area Design Review Board yesterday for a ‘preliminary review’ of  a “project bounded by Main Street, Vine Street, Upper Street and Limestone Street.”

The current plans which have not yet met the same fate as all previous plans are basically a rip off of the Gang principle. At its base, that is a good thing.

The hotel and million dollar condos appears to be about 25 stories tall and occupies just the south west corner of the block — as had the Gang design. Where the Gang hotel was iconic, pleasant to the eye, the Webbs’ latest effort is frankly better than anything they’ve come up with before without losing that classic “generic” Webb touch. It looks a little like they took one of the cheapo skyscrapers that have gone up in Manhattan in the past six years and lopped off the top. It’s kind of stubby.

But it’s still far better than the pre-Gang designs. And it does a better job (how could it not?) of keeping the street open.

Same view, street level.

From the ground, you see the austere hotel entrance (because that’s what fancy people want out of a hotel entrance, that’s why they’re paying significantly higher rates to stay here than to stay at the Hilton down the street) and in the background a fun four story glass shard structure.

This Vine street view would be a huge change to the nature of Vine. Before it was a stretch of broken sidewalk stretching in front of an empty field, this part of Vine was a stretch of broken sidewalk stretching in front of buildings that, basically, did not open to Vine. There were some trees and shade, but it was largely a beige place not inviting foot traffic nor offering a driver anything to circle back around and possibly stop for.

With the CentrePointe designs pre-Gang, the Hotel/Condo monstrosity devoured the entire block, did nothing for the public street level. It’s a bit different here and again, they’d love to take the credit, but this is Jeanne Gang’s work, not the Webbs.

The Tour de France passes the block at Vine and Limestone at dawn. Or is that dusk? It’s been raining.

 

And just as Gang prescribed, the plan hangs on to the 10 story office building at Main and Lime and the squatter glass shard building at Vine and Lime, which may host a rooftop garden, possibly with bar/restaurant, and restaurant inside. And along Main Street… three and four story retail. Again… Gang.

The biggest change here is the hotel itself.

Studio Gang’s CentrePointe, from the Vine Street canyon.

Other than that, the Webbs have done what Gang told them to. And even with the hotel, they’ve done some of what Studio Gang told them to do and for the first time, the Webbs have put forward a plan of their own (if you want to give them credit for this plan like it’s their own, which obviously it is not) that doesn’t allow the hotel to dominate the entire block (or all of downtown).

B.Fortune writes:

The block is included in the Courthouse Area Design Review Zone, in which all new buildings and exterior changes to existing structures must be approved by the Design Review Board.

Board members on Wednesday were tactful in their remarks, but they said they wanted to see changes in parts of the plan Ekhoff presented.

Several members said there needed to be more pedestrian access through the block, at ground level, so people could walk from Main Street to Vine Street.

Buildings facing Upper Street needed more windows instead of solid brick walls, they said. One board member said it now looks like the project has “turned its back on Upper Street.”

There’s a fabulous discussion about pedways — in which Dudley promises to protect the city of Lexington — but we’ll cover that in a separate post.

The Board pushed the Webbs to promise a public meeting on the project and they ecstatically agreed. Or at least, they said they would hold a public meeting.

And in terms of progress and prospects:

Board member Harry Richert asked whether the entire project, with all the buildings, could be built in phases. Webb said it would be too expensive. It will be built at one time, he said.

Webb said three businesses — Jeff Ruby’s Steakhouse out of Cincinnati, Saul Good Restaurant and Pub, and Urban Active gym — have committed to take space on the block. J. W. Marriott will take the hotel space.

That would leave a floor wide gym empty above the Big Blue Building’s parking garage (Urban InActive, I suppose) but other than that it saul good. Right?

I’ve reached out to J.W. Marriott for comment on their continued commitment to making Lexington the next location for their brand.

I recently had the chance to visit the J.W. Marriott in Grand Rapids. It was a pretty place. There were these lights. It had big windows looking over a rollicking river.

Anyway… we’ll have more later, including a closer look at the crime fighting pedways and perhaps a rumination upon the Courthouse Area Design Review Board.

Share

California’s Marriage Ban ruled Unconstitutional; Jim Gray joins Mayors for the Freedom to Marry

no comments
February 7, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

“We stand for the freedom to marry because it enhances the economic competitiveness of our communities, improves the lives of families that call our cities home, and is simply the right thing to do.”

That’s from the official statement of the Mayors for the Freedom To Marry coalition, a group founded just two weeks ago by 80 mayors.

Jim Gray and seven other Mayors just joined the group’s call for equal rights, bringing the total to 116. Chaired by the Mayors of NYC, Boston, Houston, San Diego and Los Angeles, they represent a wide group of cities from across the country:

We are a diverse group of mayors—from cities in Kansas, Indiana and West Virginia, to the four largest cities in America. Our cities are culturally, racially and geographically diverse, but we share one important value: a common commitment to fairness.

Meanwhile… today in Los Angeles, a three judge panel in Federal Appeals Court ruled California’s Prop 8 voter approved ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional:

The three-judge panel issued its ruling Tuesday morning in San Francisco, upholding a decision by Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who had been the chief judge of the Federal District Court of the Northern District of California but has since retired. Like Judge Walker, the panel found that Proposition 8 – passed by California voters in November 2008 by a margin of 52 percent to 48 percent — violated the equal protection rights of two same-sex couples that brought he suit. The proposition placed a specific prohibition in the State Constitution against marriage between two people of the same sex.

The Freedom to Marry Mayors (because we should all be free to marry Mayors) just released this statement:

“As Mayors for the Freedom to Marry, we know how important marriage is to our neighborhoods, our cities, and our nation.  When committed couples are able to pledge their love to one another and share in the responsibilities and protections of marriage, our communities flourish and our cities are more competitive. Today’s decision by the 9th Circuit reaffirms that the American Dream is possible for everyone and brings us one step closer to ending marriage discrimination once and for all.  We look forward to a day when all of our citizens will be able to share fairly and equally in the freedom to marry.”

The Prop 8 battle will go to the Supreme Court and you… well, if you aren’t lucky enough to live in Lexington, you can tell your Mayor to get on board. Just go to the Freedom to Marry site, download this statement (PDF) and take it to your Mayor.

We’re looking at you, Louisville.

Share

Rupp Funding, UK’s Response & UK Housing

2 comments
February 6, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

The Big Sunday editorial heaped praise on Mayor Gray and the Rupp Area Task Force, then called for realistic numbers in the financing phase:

However, in the next step, estimates and ideas must give way to hard numbers.

Here again, history produces a credibility gap. Painful examples of big ideas drowning out bad numbers are close at hand.

Just down the street from Rupp some of Lexington’s most historic buildings were destroyed because of promises of a huge hotel development financed by a mysterious foreign investor. Instead there’s a block of grassland.

The CentrePointe debacle also included a financial feasibilty plan that contained projections that defied reality.

Down the road in Louisville The KFC Yum Center is struggling to pay its bills because a TIF is not producing the revenue that had been anticipated, leaving the city holding the bill.

Even in these tight times, there are worthy public investments. But both the state and Lexington have little to spare and UK President Eli Capilouto has rightly made it clear he’s going to argue in Frankfort for funding education before athletics.

On that last point, of President Capilouto’s decision to focus his energy on taking state money to sell student housing to a private corporation and not get behind the city’s plans for Rupp, Dan Rowland writes:

I understand and applaud Capilouto’s desire to contrast his aims symbolically with those of his predecessor, notable for the Wildcat Coal Lodge, and other distortions of UK priorities. But to insist repeatedly and forcefully that UK places all its priorities on its own campus and none on the fate of Lexington is a symbolic statement of its own kind — and one that is badly mistaken.

Lexington has a visionary mayor and the best council I can remember. The task force working on the Rupp Arena plan has functioned smoothly, creating a strong consensus around the plans approved Jan. 31. The plan itself is outstanding, the best example of downtown planning by far that I have seen in over 30 years of sitting on downtown planning committees. These opportunities do not come around every day, and UK needs to be on board.

I am one of the most unlikely people to support a renovation of Rupp.

When my wife and I moved to Lexington in 1974, I was appalled by the plan to create a 16-acre parking lot for Rupp.

Continue reading Rowland’s piece here…

Now, while Rowland and the Ed. Board applaud Capilouto for his campus privatization plan (or, make a show of applauding him), one of the paper’s most excellent reporters takes a closer look at deal, prospects, realities and more:

U of L officials, along with those at other schools that have used EdR, call the process largely positive. But UK’s proposed deal is so much bigger and more sweeping — managing all student housing and spending as much as $500 million to replace most of the school’s 6,000 existing beds and add 3,000 more — that it largely covers uncharted territory.

….Although the EdR Web site now features a picture of all its employees in blue UK T-shirts holding Wildcat banners, a contract between the company and UK is not supposed to be approved by the UK Board of Trustees until Feb. 21.

UK officials say going this route gets them out of the costly and complicated business of construction, allowing them more time and money to focus on instruction. Modern and expanded student housing will help recruitment and allow more students to live on campus, which usually helps retention and graduation rates. In addition, UK says, it won’t have to put up any capital in the deal.

But until the details are made public, it’s hard to judge how good a deal it will be for UK and its constituents, said Lou Marcoccia, a vice-president at Syracuse University, who has worked successfully with EdR on much smaller projects.

“The question is, how can EdR put up the capital and operate it and make a profit, and why couldn’t UK do the same thing?” Marcoccia said, referring to UK’s proposal to turn over all its housing stock to EdR. “If it’s such a good idea, why isn’t everyone doing it?”

The piece goes on to examine a number of smaller deals at campuses around the country, looking at financials, and the struggle for transparency as UK works with the private company — Read It.

Share

Lexington/Fayette Urban County Council Candidates, 2012

no comments
February 1, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Urban County Council Districts 1-12

[Incumbents in bold.]

Here are the final candidates… unless you get on your high horse and go write-in on the election.

 

District 1

Chris Ford (face/site)

Marty Clifford (face/site)

 

District 2

Lisa Sanden (face/site)

Shevawn Akers (face/site)

Brannon Dunn (face/site)

 

District 3

Diane Lawless (face/site)

Stephanie Spires (face/site)

Rock Daniels (face/site)

Daniel Cooper (face/site)

 

District 4

Julian Beard (please! Julian needs no such thing.)

Sam Cox (face/site)

 

District 5

Bill Farmer, Jr (face/site)

 

District 6

Kevin O. Stinnett (face/site)

 

District 7

Jason Scott Rainey (face/site)

Jennifer Scutchfield (face/site)

 

District 8

George G. Myers (face/site)

 

District 9

Connie Kell (face/site)

Jennifer Mossotti (face/site/twit)

Bill Polyniak (face/site)

 

District 10

Harry Clarke (face/site)

Steve Nelson (face/site)

 

District 11

Peggy Henson (face/site)

 

District 12

Ed Lane (face/site)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ralph Ruschell (face/site)

Share

Archives

Search

Social Networking Crap

Shop at the Barefoot and Progressive Store!

Help support B&P! DONATE!

Share Barefoot & progressive

Winner Winner Chicken Dinner

Stop SOPA

Switch to our mobile site