King Coal

Lexington Loves Mountains… and so do you!

no comments
February 9, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

It’s that time, folks. Time for the annual mountain fest when all you mountain lovin’ freaks take to the streets and flaunt your mountain lovin’ predilections.

Disgusting amounts of fun and activism begin today and run through next Wednesday, with the biggest event coming next Tuesday, the 14th, Valentine’s Day, aka, I LOVE MOUNTAINS DAY.

Highlights of the multi-day Lexington Loves Mountains include:

  • Thursday, Feb. 9th: Film Screening — Dirty Business: “Clean Coal” And The Battle For Our Energy Future // @ Homegrown Press 7 pm, FREE, 574 N Limestone
  • Friday, Feb. 10th: I Love Mountains Oldtime Music Showcase with Rich & the Po’ Folk, Karly Dawn, Little Sarie & The Hillfolk, Sugar Tree, The Jarflies, Carrie Jean & Sylvia Rose // @ Al’s Bar, $10, 8 pm
  • Saturday Feb. 11th: Legislative Letter Writing Party Hosted by The Morris Book Shop. Featuring Kentucky Authors and Musicians. Starts at 12 pm

And more — check the facebook list for full details — including Monday’s “Dine for the Mountains” during which 10% of all food and drink sales at Third Street Stuff, Al’s Bar and Stella’s will go to KFTC.

Tuesday, February 14th is the big day. I LOVE MOUNTAIN DAY!

12:00 p.m.: Gather on the front steps of the State Capitol (please eat lunch before you arrive).

12:30 p.m. to 1:45 p.m.: Rally and march. Our rally will feature special guest speaker, Tar Sands Activist Melina Laboucan-Massimo

You can head up earlier than noon to lobby legislators, wander Frankfort or make new friends and you’ll be done by 2PM. So why wouldn’t you go?

And afterward, there’s a happy hour shindig from 4 to 8PM at Al’s Bar featuring the music of Warren Byrom and others.

So go. Blow the top off Frankfort, poison their air with your disgusting mountain loving voices.

Tell ‘em to get off your backs.

Share

H-L Ed. Board gets on Beshear’s Back

no comments
February 2, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Did you see the Herald-Leader editorial on Tuesday?

For Beshear, will coal money drown out Lynch?

Almost half the residents of the historic Harlan County town of Lynch are poor, and their per capita income of $11,206 is half that of Kentucky as a whole.

They can’t afford to protect their interests by showering money on political campaigns and parties — in sharp contrast to the owner of the Virginia coal company that wants to strip 1,105 acres of forests and hills around Lynch.

A&G Coal owner James C. Justice II and his family spent $271,600 toward Beshear’s re-election and inauguration, according to an analysis by reporter Tom Loftus of The Courier-Journal.

The Beshear administration has given preliminary approval to an A&G plan residents say will destroy their water supply and their town.

It gets worse. They go on to talk about Cambrian Coal, another top contributor, and their plan to blow up a mountain and poison water. That was blocked by an administrative judge, so Beshear’s environmental secretary Len Peters got invovled and overruled the judge, giving Cambrian just what they’d paid for.

You should read it. It’s rare for the Herald to take this hard a stance on Beshear, they often give him a pass or point out how much worse others are, but sometimes they take him to task and this is one of those times.

And to them, Steve says:

Share

Those Damn Kids and their activism

one comment
January 20, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

On Thursday morning, UK’s Beyond Coal Coalition unfurled a banner in front of the school’s library. Those damn kids!

Elaine Alvey, a senior and co-coordinator of Green Thumb, related the banner drop to the hosting of last week’s basketball game by the Sierra Club.

“We wanted to use that momentum to keep the conversation about energy going,” she said. “We want to start the semester strong.”

Johnson also explained the group’s hopes of raising awareness of UK’s relationship with coal. “People need to know there are two coal-fired plants on campus. The university needs to consider renewable energy alternatives,” he said.

Johnson listed solar and geothermal as two possible renewable energy resources. “It can happen here.”

It is not all about climate change, Flanery said in regards to the coal-fired plants on campus. “It’s about public health, too,” he said.

Over at the Herald-Leader, you can read incisive analysis from the Friends of Coal campaign:

***Who cares? These kids opinions don’t matter. They suck. This isn’t about political activism, this is about University funding. Who pays for construction on campus? coal. Who pays coach Cal’s salary? coal. What does Santa put in your stocking when you’ve been a naughty boy or girl? coal.  See its all the same.  The only question we have now is where did these kids get their 6 king sized sheets? My guess- Eli Capitulo’s house.

***This is a discrace. If it wasn’t for coal, Lexington would be up the creek without a paddle. Typical granola eating, hackysack playing, liberal agenda, Sierra Club funded bull****. They don’t mind taking money from coal severence, or accepting the donations from coal. I wish so bad, that coal operators would shut down for two months. When people started having power outages, maybe a little gratitude would be shown.

***I guess the lesson here is we all need to live like the monkeys and revert back to a primitive state. These hippies smell like dung and throw their dung like the monkeys too!!!! Probably.

***Kids are stupid! I sure hope these kids never have to heat their homes, drive a car made of steel, drive that car over a bridge made of … Well you get the point!!! I’ll say it again kids are stupid . That is why God gave them parents . I know adults can be stupid, too! If only we could somehow regulate stupid . These kids are so UNINFORMED! They have no idea that those bed sheets they sewed together and the thread they used to sew them and the needle they used are ALL produced with the help of coal! not to mention all of the synthetic materials that are in those warm clothes they are wearing … Oh, are those rubber soles on those Vans? Please be informed , not stupid!!

Well, I’m convinced. Let’s shovel the rest Eastern Kentucky directly into the furnace, the soles of my shoes are wearing out.

Share

Legacy: Department of Environmental Protection slashed 32%, Natural Resources down 15%

no comments
January 20, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

James Bruggers looks at Governor Beshear’s budget and what it does to hurt the pursuit of clean air and water:

I am not quite sure how the governor came up with his overall cut of 8.4 percent to non-coal regulatory programs in the Energy and Environment Cabinet. The budget document his staff provided shows the cabinet spending going from 284 million to 253 million next year. That’s a drop of  11 percent.

I wasn’t able to talk to state energy cabinet officials about the document, to better understand it; they said they were not allowed to discuss it with me, instead directing me to the state budget director;s office, which participated in a late afternoon press conference with dozens of reporters and no chance to really go over the thing.

But how does it appear to shake out with the agency that represents the thin green line of environmental protection in Kentucky?

Grim, to say the least. With these cuts, the Department of Environmental Protection budget would be slashed 32 percent over the last four years; Natural resources, 15 percent. That’s according to stats the governor released today. It must be frustrating for state environmental agency employees who are trying to be that thin green line but are seeing their ranks and resources dwindle.

Read on for specific line items and reax from Tom FitzGerald and the King Coal folks who say Beshear’s “support is appreciated.”

Share

Administrationtop Removal?

no comments
December 9, 2011
By David M. F. Schankula

We mentioned the other day Governor Beshear’s firing of his Natural Resources Commissioner and the subsequent resignation-in-protest of Kentucky Resources Council’s Tom FitzGerald from two state boards.

This news was then followed by the announced resignation of Johnny Greene, head of Beshear’s Office of Mine Safety and Licensing.

Sonka’s print piece this week — if you don’t get the LEO because they can’t figure out how to expand into Lexington, you can read it here — digs deeper into this turnover (or should we call it Administrationtop Removal?) and some of the underlying history. Like this:

Not only is FitzGerald unimpressed with the cabinet’s efforts in these areas, he sees possible similarities in Campbell’s dismissal to that of Ron Mills, a veteran state mine permit inspector who was fired by Peters in 2009.

Peters claimed to have fired Mills due to his poor management skills, but in a wrongful termination suit it was discovered that an employee of Alliance Coal was given advance warning of his termination by a Beshear aid. Mills had strongly challenged a mining practice used by Alliance, which is perhaps the most politically powerful coal company in Kentucky.

In a deposition in that case, Campbell — who was Mills’ supervisor — strongly rebutted Peters’ claims that he was a poor manager, citing the large reduction in his department’s staff. He also emphasized that he agreed with Mills that the mining practice in question is indeed illegal and had repeatedly conveyed that sentiment to the secretary’s office.

“I mean, there’s no love lost between (Campbell) and Secretary Peters,” says FitzGerald, who also claims that Peters tried to move him out of his position after the deposition.

LINKLEO WEEEKLY — DOWN THE MINE SHAFT

Share

Frankfort’s Toxicity?

no comments
December 6, 2011
By David M. F. Schankula

Early last week, the Beshear Administration fired — without cause or explanation — one of the state’s leading mining regulators.

Prior to serving as the Natural Resources Commissioner, Carl Campbell spent 25 years at the Department of Surface Mining.

Here’s a disingenuous quote from King Coal:

The move caught some leaders in the mining industry off guard. Kentucky Mining Association President Bill Bissett said he was unaware of any issues the industry had with Campbell.

“Commissioner Campbell’s relationship with Kentucky’s coal industry was a professional one,” Bissett said. “There were issues where the commissioner agreed with the industry’s position and issues where he disagreed. What we appreciated was his frank demeanor in communicating his position as well as maintaining that ongoing line of communication.”

And here’s a genuine quote from a more genuine source:

Tom FitzGerald, director of the Kentucky Resources Council, praised Campbell’s service as an environmental regulator and called the firing “very disturbing.”

“Commissioner Campbell has done an excellent job during this most recent stint as commissioner under very difficult circumstances,” FitzGerald said. “One would have hoped that in a second term, the Beshear administration would want to create some legacy more meaningful than just having lasted eight years.

He added: “We’ve seen significant damage done to the environmental programs and significant politicization of the management of these environmental programs in this administration.”

By the end of the week, that voice of reason had seen enough. Tom FitzGerald, head of the Kentucky Resources Council, sent Governor Beshear a letter resigning from his position on two state boards, the Kentucky Environmental Education Council and the Center for Renewable Energy Research and Environmental Stewardship.

Mr. FitzGerald’s letter to Governor Steve Beshear, in full:

Dear Governor Beshear:

I am writing to inform you of my decision, effectively immediately, to step down from my appointments to the Kentucky Environmental Education Council and the Center for Renewable Energy Research and Environmental Stewardship. While it has been a privilege to have served as a Board member for the Council and the Center, and while I am most appreciative of the opportunity that you gave me to serve in both of those capacities, I cannot in good conscience continue to serve as your appointee to either Board in light of the current Administration’s environmental and energy policies.

The serial budgetary reductions in general funds for environmental protection programs, which over the course of the last four years have amounted to some 26%, have placed a tremendous strain on the administration and enforcement of core air, water and waste programs, and continue to compromise the ability to properly implement programs for which Kentucky sought delegation and to which Kentucky committed it would provide sufficient funding. That programs intended to protect the building blocks of a healthy commonwealth and economy – the air, land, and water resources – are not considered by your Administration to be priorities with respect to allocating budget decisions, is of grave concern. That only one of those programs (Title V air permits) collects from regulated sources the fees necessary to offset the cost of regulation, leaving the taxpayers to subsidize other pollution control programs through general funds, is indefensible.

The recent firing of the Department for Natural Resources Commissioner brought into sharp relief my growing concern that the Administration has lost its bearing regarding regulation of the coal industry. The promise made by Congress to the residents of the coalfields in 1977 that they would be fully protected from the adverse effects of coal mining, that the land would be contemporaneously reclaimed and the footprint of mining minimized, has yet to be kept, and the removal of the Commissioner at a time when his office was attempting to increase reclamation bonds to appropriate levels (despite resistance within the industry), to implement the cumulative hydrologic impact assessment process properly for the first time in 29 years, and to stem the disturbing trend of towards greater numbers of violations within the coal industry (the rate of industry compliance in FY 2010 was the lowest since 1990), is disturbing.

It has been an honor to be a member of the Board of the Kentucky Environmental Education Council, which plays a critical role in elevating environmental literacy in the Commonwealth, yet has suffered budget reductions that if left unremedied will weaken its ability to do so. The Board and staff of the Council are remarkable and are dedicated to fulfilling the Council’s mission. I will continue to support the mission of the Council, and would encourage your Administration to restore the funding that has been diverted from the Council.

The Center for Renewable Energy Research and Environmental Stewardship has, unfortunately, done little since its establishment other than adopting operating procedures, and the goals set out by the General Assembly for that Center remain almost entirely unmet. That the current Energy and Environment Cabinet Secretary indicated at the last Board meeting he would not participate in a proposed strategic planning process through which the Board might focus on how to achieve the mission envisioned for it by the legislature, suggests to me that absent a greater degree of independence in funding and Board management, the Center will play a marginal role in helping to move Kentucky towards a sustainable energy future.

In closing, I thank you for the opportunity to have served on the Boards of the Kentucky Environmental Education Council, and the Center for Renewable Energy Research and Environmental Stewardship.

Cordially,

Tom FitzGerald
Director

This morning’s Herald-Leader Editorial follows this turn of events:

Energy and Environment Secretary Len Peters has given no reason for firing Campbell, who has said he does not know the reason.

Peters’ choice to replace Campbell will be revealing.

Also revealing will be what happens to the initiatives cited by FitzGerald.

There’s little recourse when a coal company fails to properly reclaim a mining site and has posted an insufficient bond.

But to all these voices, Steve Beshear says…

Share

POLITICO doesn’t get it

one comment
November 28, 2011
By David M. F. Schankula

In a Thanksgiving morning post listing reasons why each of our two big too fail political parties should be thankful this holiday season, POLITICO’s Alex Isenstadt got his factoids wrong.

After first reciting, correctly, that Kentucky voters do not like the President of the United States of America, Alex then highlighted Beshear’s landslide victory:

Now, his campaign playbook is a one-stop manual for how Democrats can win in conservative states where the president is lagging: distance yourself from the national party and run as a nonideological, pro-business leader who’s willing to work with Republicans as well as Democrats. Best of all, Beshear managed the feat without completely throwing his president and party to the wolves.

When the dust settled on Election Day, Beshear defeated GOP state Senate President David Williams 56 percent to 35 percent, an impressive margin of victory for an incumbent governor in any state — let alone a Democrat in a state where Obama will be lucky to win 40 percent of the vote in 2012.

This is an oversimplification of the state of Kentucky and what the rest of the nation could learn (if anything).

Beshear won big because, as Joe Gerth already pointed out, people do not like David Williams. Like, at all. Even Republicans can’t stand him.

Beshear won big because, as the Herald-Leader already pointed out, he had far more cash to play with.

Beshear had more money to play with because Republicans didn’t like David Williams. It was so sad that about the only way the Republican Governors Association could be pushed to get involved was to have Williams’ father-in-law give them the money to spend on David’s race.

It wasn’t just Republicans who didn’t like David Williams, it was the big monied interests who run this state. And that had less to do with David Williams and more to do with Steve Beshear.

Take King Coal, for example. Beshear is so far down their right pant pocket, they needn’t bother themselves with David Williams or anyone else. In fact, Beshear’s campaign was a boon for the coal industry not simply from a regulatory standpoint but because they didn’t have to drop any real cash on the race. They simply sat this one out and saved it up for 2015 when they’ll try to buy the next guy, one way or another.

This is not a “campaign playbook” for anyone, let alone “a one stop manual for how Democrats can win in conservative states.”

It simply is not. To pretend Kentucky and Steve Beshear have lessons to behold makes for an easy column point on Thanksgiving morning, but there’s very little about Beshear’s victory for which most Democrats could give any long term thanks.

And then there’s this line from POLITICO: “Best of all, Beshear managed the feat without completely throwing his president and party to the wolves.”

One must give them credit for choosing wolves as the object of the throw rather than some form of motorized mass transit, but that’s where the credit can stop.

That notion, if true, would be one helluva sad “thanks” for Democrats to offer up over their turkey.

It would be, if true, a heartening “playbook” plot point encouraging Dems in other states to not throw the Big O into the wood chipper.

But the key word is “completely” and that’s the saddest part. Beshear spent most of the year dumping on the President — usually over coal and the EPA. Steve went so far as to fabricate some big in-your-face moment he never had with the President on an airport tarmac.

He didn’t come out in support of Obama’s reelection until just days before the election.

So, the playbook for Dems in other states, for national wonks — and the thankfulness Democrats are supposed to have — comes down to this:

–If a Democrat runs against the President, attacks him, and is also lucky enough to get a Republican opponent so unpopular Joe Stalin might’ve beat him, then the Democrat might win, especially if he can raise millions and millions more than his useless, disliked opponent.

That’s the lesson from Kentucky. Don’t get us wrong… we’re still celebrating. It’s nice to win one once in a while down here. But only a deluded Democrat would give thanks for what this election might teach us.

Share

Herald-Leader endorses Gatewood

no comments
October 30, 2011
By David M. F. Schankula

No.

They didn’t really. Sorry.

They went with Steve Beshear. What did you expect?

Here’s their ringing endorsement:

We’d like to see a more ambitious Beshear in his second term. He should quit avoiding tax reform, raise his sights above trading tax breaks for any low-paying jobs, get more aggressive about energy diversification and rebuild Kentucky’s environmental protection agency. The mountains desperately need an economic strategy beyond coal.

And we’d like to play with dinosaurs and grow giant fields of wheat on the Great Plains of Southeastern Kentucky.

It’s okay to dream.

***UPDATE***
Forgot to mention… CN|2′s Alessi brought us news on Friday that Steve’s saying he’s not only not challenge Mitch McConnell in 2014, he’s also not going to challenge Rand Paul in 2016… or anyone else. Sweet Jane’s had enough of Steve. Steve’s gonna do his full time, he says, not leave early and never run for anything ever again.

Beshear, a Democrat, put to rest any notion that he might run for another office, including seeking a rematch with U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell in 2014. McConnell beat Beshear by double-digits in 1996.

“No,” Beshear said flatly when asked whether he would consider another campaign. (2:20 in the video). “This is it for me. I love my wife, and I want to stay married to her. I don’t think she’d appreciate it if I did any more.”

Click over for the video and full story.

Should you believe him? You could. But maybe the people will “demand” it and, you know, you never want to say never.

Share

War on War on Coal Party!

no comments
October 24, 2011
By David M. F. Schankula

Hal Rogers, Rand Paul and “celebrities” show up for a rally in support of the war on “the war” on coal:

It is awesome.

Share

Brett Guthrie’s answer actually IS dirty air.

no comments
October 24, 2011
By David M. F. Schankula

Brett Guthrie reveals the President’s secret plan:

“He goes to North Carolina yesterday and says the Republicans answer is dirty air, that’s not true and it’s unworthy of the presidency.”

Representative Guthrie says he doesn’t want dirty air, but regulating the EPA is very expensive and would affect many Kentuckians.

“They’re trying to put coal-power plants out of business, that’s ninety-five percent of Kentuckians energy, that’s why we have cheap energy.”

There are a couple things wrong with Mr. Guthrie’s reasoning:

1. “They” are not trying to put coal-power plants out of business. This industry claim, parroted by Republicans (and our Governor and Congressman), is couldn’t be more misleading. An energy industry consultancy group released a report on this very subject earlier this month. They studied the Obama administration’s EPA regulations and the purported ‘disastrous’ effects on the industry. They found:

Contrary to some projections that indicate environmental regulations will severely impact U.S. coal production, ICF projects that U.S. coal production and prices will remain stable. In particular, demand for low sulfur Powder River Basin coal and low-cost, high-sulfur Illinois Basin coal is expected to be strong.

Clearly, then, if Mr. Guthrie and company know that the EPA regulations won’t destroy the coal industry, then what other motivation do they have in trying to destroy the EPA? Either it’s about maximizing profits for their cronies, or its about dirtying our air.

It’s Brett Guthrie who’s unworthy of the job of protecting people.

2. The only ones putting the coal industry out of business are the coal industry themselves. Or, depending on how you look at it, G-d.

Witness:

Coal here is getting harder and costlier to dig — and the region, which includes southern West Virginia, Virginia and Tennessee, is headed for a huge collapse in coal production.

The U.S. Department of Energy projects that in a little more than three years, the amount of coal mined here will be just half of what it was in 2008. That’s a significant loss of a signature Appalachian industry, and the jobs that come with it.

“The seams of coal that are left in this area are harder and harder to mine, and they’re thinner and thinner and thinner,” said Leonard Fleming, a retired Kentucky miner and union leader in Letcher County who worked in the industry for 32 years.

The fact that Kentuckians get over nine tenths of their electricity from coal is fine and all, but it’s not going to do us much good in a few years. You can’t mine what’s not there… which is one reason the mining companies have their minions, like Brett Guthrie, fight to destroy the EPA. If they would just get off our backs, we could flatten the Appalachians and siphon out what little remaining coal we can find.

And if that dirties the air in the process… let alone all the other health ramifications… then Brett Guthrie is for it.

3. There are actually a lot more than a couple, but Brett seems a little slow so we’ll leave it here for now and keep it simple for him.

Share

Archives

Search

Social Networking Crap

Shop at the Barefoot and Progressive Store!

Help support B&P! DONATE!

Share Barefoot & progressive

Winner Winner Chicken Dinner

Stop SOPA

Switch to our mobile site