Mitch McConnell

Mitching & Boehning: McConnell and John squabbling…

no comments
February 21, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

The decision by House Republican leaders to give in on the payroll tax rather than raise taxes on the middle class put Mitch McConnell in an awkward position, straining his relationship with Boner and setting a course into the months ahead in which John is stuck between his more establishment leadership, his insurgent freshmen Tea Partiers and the haughty Senate Republicans who’d prefer to boss the House around than listen to the true conservative patriots. And Mitch has to work with that.

February 14th, The Hill:

McConnell staying at arm’s length

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) publicly distanced himself from House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Tuesday, the latest twist in a relationship put to the test in recent weeks.

McConnell declined to endorse a proposal announced by Boehner on Monday to extend the payroll tax holiday without paying for it.

February 17th, The Hill:

Senate approves payroll tax cut in 60-36 vote after GOP gives up filibuster

The Senate voted 60-36 Friday to extend the payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits after Senate leaders agreed to lower the threshold for passing the legislation.

Fourteen Republicans voted for the legislation, including Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), who said just last week the cost of the payroll tax holiday extension should be offset.

February 21st, The Hill:

McConnell risks political capital to show solidarity with Boehner in payroll fight

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) risked some political capital last week to make a high-profile show of solidarity with House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), allaying scrutiny of their relationship.

McConnell split with his entire leadership team and most of the Senate GOP conference to vote for a 10-month extension of the payroll tax holiday, despite his own deep misgivings.

And the Wall Street Journal, this morn:

Party Squabbles Risk GOP’s Agenda

Tensions burst into view last week as Congress closed the book on extending a payroll-tax cut. With the GOP in the House and Senate at odds over the matter, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was publicly frustrated—uncharacteristic for him—while House Speaker John Boehner was dismissive of Senate Republicans.

Lower-ranking lawmakers were blunter. “I don’t know if the Senate could find the House of Representatives on a Google map,” said Rep. Cory Gardner of Colorado, a freshman Republican.

The split, if unresolved, threatens to spill over into other legislation, including a multibillion-dollar highway bill and the Republican budget proposal.

Share

McConnell & GOP push pipeline to create 20 jobs

2 comments
February 14, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

If ya haven’t heard, the Keystone XL pipeline is back, thanks to Mitch McConnell:

Six Republican senators, including Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell, formally filed an amendment on Monday to a highway funding bill that would approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline.

It is the latest move in an uphill battle by Republicans to advance TransCanada’s $7 billion project after President Barack Obama last month said it should be put on hold pending further environmental reviews of a new route for its Nebraska portion.

The amendment still has to make it into the bill, then get past the Senate and blah blah blah… more important, at the moment, is that you sign this petition and spread it around amongst all yer friends and families and socialist networks and so forth:

And to all your friends who are of differing views on the idea of the pipeline, you might want to point out to them that the “thousands of jobs” Republican leaders keep insisting the pipeline will create are actually… closer to twenty:

TransCanada Corp. (TRP)’s Keystone XL oil pipeline, heralded by supporters as a major job creator, will add few permanent positions once the $7 billion project is built.

The number of people needed to operate and maintain the 1,661-mile (2,673-kilometer) pipeline may be as few as 20, according to the U.S. State Department, or as many as a few hundred, according to TransCanada.

“I don’t see a big jobs impact,” Stephen Fuller, director of the Center for Regional Analysis at George Mason University in Arlington, Virginia, said in an interview. “It gets the oil into refineries that already exist. It’s like replacing a bridge on the highway.”

(And that’s a story from Bloomberg, BTW, not exactly a lefty granola site. You can point that out to them, too.)

While the pipeline remains held up (for now… did you sign that petition yet?), TransCanada’s doing okay with 4th Q revenues up 39%.

Share

Two Republican Senators Split with McConnell/GOP over Birth Control

no comments
February 14, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Greg Sargent/WaPo:

Mitch McConnell vowed over the weekend to turn the battle against Obama’s proposal into a crusade that won’t end until the White House backs down. But as Igor Volsky notes, two GOP Senators — Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins — have voiced cautious support for Obama’s compromise, breaking with the idea that it’s an assault on religious liberty.

Snowe: “It appears that changes have been made that provide women’s health services without compelling Catholic organizations in particular to violate the beliefs and tenets of their faith.”

Collins: “While I will carefully review the details of the president’s revised proposal, it appears to be a step in the right direction…The administration has finally listened to the concerns raised by many and appears to be seeking to avoid the threat to religious liberties posed by its original plan.”

Come on, Mitch! Control your women.

Share

Mitch McConnell’s “abhorrent” attack on American Catholics

no comments
February 8, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Mitch took to the Senate floor Tuesday to attack the Obama administration for a ruling which ensures people in search of reproductive health benefits, regardless of their religious, won’t be denied those benefits by their employers or the medical industry, regardless of their religion. Mitch called this defense of individual liberty “abhorrent.”

Consider this:

Catholic leaders and the GOP presidential candidates have intentionally distorted the Obama administration’s new rule requiring employers and insurers to provide reproductive health benefits at no additional cost sharing. Conservatives are seeking a way to politically unite Republican voters around a social issue and portray the regulation as a big government intrusion into religious liberties. In reality, the mandate is modeled on existing rules in six states, exempts houses of worship and other religious nonprofits that primarily employ and serve people of faith, and offers employers a transitional period of one year to determine how best to comply with the rule.

It’s also nothing new. Twenty-eight states already require organizations that offer prescription insurance to cover contraception and since 98 percent of Catholic women use birth control, many Catholic institutions offer the benefit to their employees.

And ponder this:

Share

Catching up with the Mitch McConnell

one comment
February 6, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Mitch McConnell is going to great lengths to express no GOP presidential preference, comparing the current race favorably to the Clinton/Obama 2008 race:

“I don’t think the primary voters out in the presidential contests need any advice from me, particularly about who to support or how quickly to end it,” McConnell told reporters on Capitol Hill. “It will end when it ends. And at that point I think we’re going to have a nominee who’s very competitive.”

He went on to suggest that the charges flying in the GOP fight could help.

“I think we have an excellent chance to have a new president next year, and we’re just all watching, like you are, the drama associated with this contest,” McConnell said. “It’s reminiscent of the contest between Obama and Clinton on the other side in 2008. Obviously that ended at some point. I think it was about June. And it didn’t seem to have done them any harm in the general election, and I don’t think this contest is going to do us any harm either.”

But Mitch isn’t seeing eye-to-eye with Mittens on earmarks:

A bipartisan effort to permanently ban earmarks has split Republicans, putting a large group of them at odds with GOP presidential front-runner Mitt Romney.

The Senate legislation, which could be voted on soon, presents an awkward position for Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), a senior member of the Appropriations Committee.

McConnell, who has not endorsed in the Republican presidential primary, has not taken a public stance on the bill.

Asked about the leader’s position, an aide to McConnell replied, “He hasn’t said yet but will let you know when he does.”

McConnell has shown a fondness for earmarks during his career, touting the pet projects he secured for his home state.

A spokeswoman for Romney’s campaign said Tuesday that the former Massachusetts governor is in favor of a permanent earmark ban.

And he’s loaded up on cash:

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is two years away from his next re-election campaign and nine months away from a host of Senate elections that could make him the chamber’s majority leader.

That is the story behind the Kentucky Republican’s latest campaign finance reports, which show that his Senate re-election committee had $4.25 million at the end of 2011 and his leadership political action committee had $469,000, according to the latest report filed with the Federal Election Commission.

And in this hard-hitting interview, Mitch McConnell says Barry Hussein is the most divisive president in his history in Washington:

Mitch tries particularly hard to claim the only thing Barack cares about is his own re-election. Which doesn’t make a lot of sense. But Mitch is amused by it.

“And, it was all about demonizing people who’ve been successful, trying to make people who have been less successful envious of those who have been. And of course there is nothing liberals like more than taking your money and spending it the way they want to spend it. You know, the government doesn’t need any more money; we’re awash in revenue.”

Class Warfare!

Share

Revisionist History with Mitch McConnell

no comments
February 2, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Talking Points Memo:

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has embraced the argument that President Obama was able to pass every bit of his legislative agenda in his first two years thanks to large Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress. It’s intended as a counterpoint to the President’s re-election strategy of attacking the congressional GOP as do-nothing obstructionists. But it’s also a revisionist history of the 111th Congress, during which McConnell more than any other Republican in Washington stood athwart Obama’s agenda to great effect.

The White House has “been trying to pretend like the President just showed up yesterday, just got sworn in and started fresh,” McConnell declared Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union. “In fact, he’s been in office for three years. He got everything he wanted from a completely compliant Congress for two of those three years… We are living in the Obama economy.”

This isn’t a new claim for McConnell, but it’s audacious even by Washington’s lax standards. It was McConnell, after all, who led Senate Republicans in serial filibusters — a record-setting number — successfully thwarting large chunks of Obama’s agenda.

They go on to pick Mitch’s claim apart, piece by piece.

Of course, Mitch’s revisionist history isn’t just an attempt to excuse how he and his GOP colleagues have ground Washington to a halt at a time when the country can least afford legislative stagnation.

Mitch’s revisionist history also seeks to revise the economic reality of America. McConnell insists that Obama, having been in office for three years, is to blame for our fiscal house being in foreclosure.

This is not true.

The Center for American Progress:

The federal budget deficit will again exceed $1 trillion this fiscal year, the Congressional Budget Office reported today. That news is sure to trigger another round of condemnations from politicians and pundits who have a political or ideological interest in pinning these deficits on the domestic spending policies of President Barack Obama.

Unfortunately for them, today’s report—along with dozens of other similar CBO reports in recent years—actually proves the opposite—that the current deficit is overwhelmingly the result of two factors: events that occurred before President Obama took office and tax cuts.

In fact, higher spending under Obama accounts for less than 20 percent of this year’s deficit, and nearly half of that was additional defense spending—not domestic spending. Bottom line: The narrative that an “Obama spending spree” caused our deficit problem is utterly false.

It should surprise no one that Mitch McConnell and the Republican Party don’t understand these fiscal facts, after all, they are the ones who led the country toward economic collapse.

At the start of 2007, the CBO projected a 2012 surplus of $170 Billion. By the time Obama took office two years later, they had already readjusted that estimate to a deficit of $264 Billion.

That Bush flip flop came primarily from the onset of the economic collapse. Mitch McConnell and the Republicans can pretend they didn’t cause that collapse, and they can further claim that all its net negative effects ended on January 20th, 2012. They can also claim to be the Party of Lincoln, to love their country, and to be on the right side of G-d.

Claiming stuff is easy, and Mitch is pretty good at it. But again, he’s wrong:

Increased spending prior to 2009—especially on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq—also contributed to this year’s deficit, to the tune of $153 billion. That’s because higher spending in 2007 and 2008, mostly relating to overseas military operations, caused the CBO to adjust its assumptions to more realistically project similar spending in 2012.

All told, 35 percent of the swing from a $170 billon projected surplus to a $1.079 billion deficit is directly attributable to events that preceded the current president’s term.

The remainder of the deterioration did happen after 2009, but higher spending wasn’t even close to the main culprit. The real problem was lower-than-expected revenues.

Oh, yes, the continuing gift of the Bush Tax Cuts. Read on.

Share

McConnell continues to push Greece lie disproved last summer

2 comments
January 27, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

In an example of why HD television was created, FOX News’ Greta Van Susteren interviewed Mitch McConnell the other day, an 8 minute visual orgy in which the two spoke casually while standing rather than sitting and Greta repeatedly emphasized the words “debt ceiling” with a gangsta-style hand gesture. If only they broadcast this in 3D.

In the interview, and driven home in FNC’s headline, Mitch McConnell again pushes this story that America is about to become the next Greece:

VAN SUSTEREN: You say we are beginning to look like Greece. If the status quo stays where in your mind in terms of where we’re headed, when would you anticipate would be Greece?

MCCONNELL: I don’t know how quickly we’d get there, but we’ll get there a lot quicker than any of us would like. And when you have a debt the size of your economy, when we already do, we begin to look a lot like Greece and western Europe.

You know, the best way to sum up what they’ve done in western Europe, Margaret Thatcher once said the trouble with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people’s money. That is exactly what has happened in Europe, and we are on the same path. This administration is leading us down the same path. Unless they are stopped by the people of this country in November, 2012, they will continue to take us down the western European path.

It’s probably for the best that Mitch doesn’t want to predict when, exactly, America will go Greek because then it would be easier for observers to paint him as some sort of false-prognosticator, like that guy who keeps predicting the rapture.

As it happens, Mitch doesn’t know when this certain inevitability will occur, but that won’t stop him from repeating it again and again even after it’s been disproved.

While making his argument against funding firefighters and police, Mitch McConnell predicted the Greecification of America in October 2011, via USA Today:

Speaking on CNN’s State of the Union, McConnell said the issue is the size of the federal government’s nearly $15 trillion debt, not teachers, police and firefighters.

“They are local and state employees,” McConnell said. “Look, we have a debt the size of our economy. That alone makes us look a lot like Greece. The question is whether the federal government can afford to be bailing out states. I think the answer is no.”

And here’s Mitch in July 2011, from The Hill:

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) said Wednesday that the financial state of the U.S. is similar to bankrupt Greece.

Making the case for major spending reductions a day before congressional leaders will meet with President Obama, McConnell said, “We look a lot like Greece already.”

And in March 2011, on FOX News Sunday:

WALLACE: Senator, what does that mean? That there has to be a deal on entitlements and taxes or you are going to vote against extending the debt limit?

MCCONNELL: What it means is this, we have a $14 trillion debt, $14 trillion. That’s the size of our economy, which begins to make us look a lot like Greece.

This pattern from a man who last June famously said, “Well, I think we’ve gotten to the point where we ought to put aside our talking points.”

Repeatedly predicting an impending doom which repeatedly does not happen is troubling enough. But when that prediction is itself predicated on an established falsehood, Mitch’s repetition becomes a series of lies.

Last summer, FactCheck.org politely explained that McConnell “exaggerates” and while the American economy, and its balance between debt and GDP, is indeed in bad shape, “it’s not close to the size of Greece’s debt, which was 142.8 percent of that nation’s GDP as of the end of last year, according to the most recent figures from Eurostat, the official statistical office of the European Union.”

FactCheck.org went on:

Furthermore, McConnell is making an apples-to-oranges comparison. The $14 trillion figure refers to “total debt oustanding,” much of which is money that the government owes to the Social Security trust funds and other governmental entities, not money actually borrowed from the public. The U.S. “debt held by the public” is currently less than $9.8 trillion. That’s the proper figure to compare to what Greece owes, and in relation to GDP it’s currently less than half the Greek level.

Others have been less guarded with their examination of Mitch’s claim.

Last July, after McConnell launched the talking point, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham picked it up… leading Steve Benen at the Washington Monthly to write:

Look, the very idea is just crazy. The U.S. has extremely low interest rates and foreign investor are happy to loan us money; Greece has extremely high interest rates and no one is eager to loan the country money. The U.S. has our own currency; Greece has the Euro. We have a great credit rating (for now); Greece has an awful credit rating. We have a manageable debt; Greece has a debt crisis. We’re a large country with an enormous economy; Greece is a small country with a small economy. We have one of the world’s most stable systems of government (at least until six months ago); Greece’s government structure is a little shaky.

For an elected American senator — and media darling — to tell a national television audience that the United States is “becoming Greece” is a clear signal: Lindsey Graham is not to be taken seriously on these issues.

If Graham sincerely believes his own rhetoric, he has no idea what he’s talking about. If Graham is just playing some kind of cynical game, he’s a hack.

Paul Krugman graphed part of the stark difference between the two countries, and also pointed out that while the rate on US bonds sat at around 3%, Greek bonds were at 16.82%.

Behind Mitch’s erroneous comparison lies Mitch’s agenda. He does not truly believe America is in any way like Greece, he is simply trying to capitalize on the Greek misery in order to scare Americans into believing that the real problem in this country is out of control government spending — Medicare must be demolished and with it Social Security. This has been the Republican Party’s goal since the two social programs were created.

And in that, Greece offers the starkest example of an idea of Europe as a collection of countries that spent their way into economic collapse — Mitch’s argument is that social well-being bankrupts countries and all government programs meant to help people live better lives are fiscally irresponsible.

Here, too, Mitch McConnell is incorrect and here, too, he knows it all too well.

As ThinkProgress pointed out in December:

These charts show that, according to deficits and debt, countries like Spain and Ireland were acting much more responsibly than Germany and France — therefore it can’t have been deficits and debt that caused their problems. As The American Prospect’s Harold Myerson put it, “some of Europe’s current basket cases were actually running budget surpluses in the years before the Lehman meltdown. Ireland and Spain weren’t overspending at all — but the banks and investors speculating on their housing markets most certainly were.” What Europe needed was better regulation of its financial sector and a central bank willing to take the steps necessary to lessen the pain of the Great Recession, neither of which it had.

There is no doubt America faces serious economic challenges, and it’s not ridiculous at all to consider that our economy may well collapse further. But using these realities to dismantle programs that didn’t cause the problem is cynical-verging-on-evil.

Scaring people into believing that this is what happened, that America is like Greece, when clearly it is not, and that the only way to prevent collapse is to remove the President from office and dismantle Medicare… that’s just Mitch McConnell. It’s not true and it’s dangerous.

 

And while we’re on the subject of GDP… the nation’s economy grew for the tenth straight quarter:

There is still much to worry about, but that picture is going in the right direction and the last thing Mitch McConnell wants anyone to do is notice it, let alone the date at which it started to change.

It’s almost like Mitch McConnell wants America to fail.

Why do you hate America, Mitch? Why do you hate your country?

Share

McConnell raises $1M, has $4.25M on hand

no comments
January 18, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Ben Chandler/Steve Beshear/Crit Luallen really have their work cut out for themselves.

Mitch’s people tell the AP that the Minority Leader raised $1,000,000.00 from October to December, thanks to his continued leadership of the Republican Party’s effort to keep America from accomplishing anything:

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has $4.25 million for a re-election campaign that’s still nearly three years away, a signal to potential Democratic challengers they’d likely enter the race at a distinct financial disadvantage.

Obviously making the defeat of the President of the United States of America your top priority (above keeping America in operation) is good for your own bottom line, even if the rest of the country suffers.

Here he is in 2010:

And again in 2011:

Share

Warren Buffett v. Mitch McConnell

one comment
January 12, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Last Fall, Warren Buffett made the argument for taxing the super-wealthy and Mitch McConnell tried to dismiss Warren by telling him to “send in a check.”

Buffett fires back in this week’s TIME, challenging Mitch and his rich buddies to an NPR-style matching fund pledge drive:

“I thought of offering to match the total amount — if we go to a contribution system — I’ll match the total contribution made by all Republican members of Congress, and I’ll even go three for one with McConnell.  (Laughs.)

It’s kind of touching this faith he has in the American public, that with a one-point two or three trillion dollar deficit that he thinks Americans are so wonderfully spirited that they would just solve it all by contributions.  That is a tax policy only a Republican could come up with.  So Mitch — and he’s got this line, he’s got this proposal out there — I would definitely, it’s a firm offer, all the Republican members of Congress and like I say, I’m willing to triple his.  I’ll match the rest of them.”

When TIME pointed out Mitch is valued at $10 Million, Warren dismissed McConnell’s worthlessness – ”I’m not worried,” he said.

Mitch’s spokesmale told TIME that Mitch had no interest in paying his fare share to keep America afloat and that the Minority Leader would rather see the entire country drown than take Warren up on his offer.

Share

Mitch & Rand v. Obama at Supreme Court

no comments
January 10, 2012
By David M. F. Schankula

Obamacare is headed to the Supreme Court based on the clear precedent that Medicare and Social Security are also unconstitutional and while the White House’s legal defense argues it’s the of result of “nearly (a) century-long national effort to expand access to health care by making affordable health insurance more widely available” and is built in part upon the Romneycare example, 35 Senate Republicans have filed an amicus brief in opposition to providing preventative care and requiring breast and prostate exams and in outlawing ‘preexisting conditions and so forth — signed by both Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul.

U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and 35 of his colleagues filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court Friday on behalf of the bipartisan, multi-state challenge to the Democrats’ health spending law.

“Americans have been telling Washington for years now that they oppose a 2,700 page health spending bill that dramatically increases costs and expands the reach of the federal government into their health care decisions,” Sen. McConnell said. “In addition to determining the constitutionality of the mandate, that individuals purchase health insurance, the Supreme Court also will consider whether the mandate is severable from other provisions of the PPACA; in other words, whether the other provisions of the law are legally viable in the event the Court finds the mandate unconstitutional. We believe the mandate is not severable from the PPACA because the law will not function as its Congressional proponents intended or achieve their objectives without the presence of the mandate.”

Since its enactment, Senate Republicans have twice submitted an amicus brief in the lower courts in support of the states and private parties that are challenging the PPACA in federal court. This would be the first of two amicus briefs filed by Senate Republicans in the Supreme Court case.

 

 

Share

Archives

Search

Social Networking Crap

Shop at the Barefoot and Progressive Store!

Help support B&P! DONATE!

Share Barefoot & progressive

Winner Winner Chicken Dinner

Stop SOPA

Switch to our mobile site