Did you folks enjoy watching the Curse of CentrePointe at work last week? I know you did.
Well, here’s some more fun for you political numbers geeks out there: the precinct results!
In the primary, Jim Gray only won 9 Lexington precincts outside of New Circle Road. Jim Newberry won 167 precincts outside the circle.
This time? Look: (shaded=Newberry win, non-shaded=Gray win)
That’s right, not only did Jim Gray dominate outside of the circle (while almost winning all of the precincts inside the circle), he won more precincts in the southern suburbs. They had the right message to win them over, the best field staff and volunteers (and resources) in the state, and they simply beat Newberry on his own turf.
To give you a clear picture of the jump that Jim Gray took after the primary, consider this: of the 287 precincts, there was not a single one where Gray’s % of the vote dropped, whereas Newberry’s % dropped in 81 precincts. Another? In only 11 of the 287 precincts did Newberry improve his % of the vote by more than Jim Gray. Those numbers are simply staggering.
Let’s take a closer look at where the game changed for Jim Gray from May 18th to November 2nd. The following map shows the precincts where Jim Gray gained the largest % of votes from his performance in the primary.
(Red = +40%, Blue = +30%, Green =+25%)
The first obvious thing that you learn from this map is that Teresa Isaac’s best districts on the north end swung heavily towards Gray. In fact, only one precinct that she won went to Newberry (barely).
To use one example, look at the Douglas-Washington precinct (73) on the north end. In the primary, these were the results:
Isaac- 69%
Newberry- 20%
Gray- 8%
Here was the general:
Gray- 61%
Newberry- 39%
This is (by far) the most drastic example of this, but in some of the precincts colored red, blue and green in the north, a similar pattern emerges. Isaac took about 50% in the primary, and Newberry/Gray split the rest, but the Isaac voters swung heavily to Gray in the general.
Obviously, the Isaac endorsement was huge. But this remains only a part of the story of Gray’s victory, as Isaac’s districts were few in number and did not make up a huge % of the electorate.
Gray assured himself victory by going into the south end and conquering Newberry on his own turf.
As you can see on the map, Jim Gray absolutely cleaned house on the south end territory surrounded by New Circle, Richmond Road, Man O’ War and Nicholasville Road. And this is an area that Newberry dominated in the primary. Check out the difference in these precincts:
(218) Saddlebrook
Primary- Newberry 49%, Gray 14%
General- Gray 61%, Newberry 39%
(238) Stephen Foster
Primary- Newberry 51%, Gray 26%
General- Gray 64%, Newberry 36%
(177) Niagra
Primary- Newberry 36%, Gray 21%
General- Gray 52%, Newberry 48%
(246) Tatesbrook
Primary- Newberry 55%, Gray 21%
General- Gray 53%, Newberry 47%
(139) Kirklevington
Primary- Newberry 42%, Gray 32%
General- Gray 65%, Newberry 35%
(93) Fox Harbour
Primary- Newberry 49%, Gray 21%
General- Gray 52%, Newberry 48%
(52) Century Hills
Primary- Newberry 40%, Gray26 %
General- Gray 61%, Newberry 39%
(281) Winter Garden
Primary- Newberry 28%, Gray 28%
General- Gray 60%, Newberry 40%
(285) Woodspoint
Primary- Newberry 30%, Gray 24%
General- Gray 60%, Newberry 40%
(94) Gainsway
Primary- Newberry 42%, Gray 29%
General- Gray 57%, Newberry 43%
(184) Old Farm
Primary- Newberry 41%, Gray 34%
General- Gray 60%, Newberry 40%
(275) Wildwood
Primary- Newberry 37%, Gray 33%
General- Gray 59%, Newberry 41%
(242) Summerhill
Primary- Newberry 43%, Gray 31%
General- Gray 58%, Newberry 42%
(65) Cove Lake
Primary- Newberry 39%, Gray 32%
General- Gray 61%, Newberry 39%
(5) Aqueduct
Primary- Newberry 41%, Gray 30%
General- Gray 56%, Newberry 44%
(199) Plainview
Primary- Newberry 37%, Gray 35%
General- Gray 63%, Newberry 37%
Yet Gray’s victory is even more than these south end precincts that he conquered. He also cut into Newberry’s chances by challenging him in his strongest suburban precincts that had very high turnout, basically hanging close enough to negate their effect.
Here are a few examples
(84) Fairhaven (south of Man O’War off Tates Creek)
Primary- Newberry 54%, Gray 32%
General- Gray- 50.3%, Newberry 49.7%
(147) Laurelwood (south of Fairhaven)
Primary- Newberry 53%, Gray 29%
General- Gray 52%, Newberry 48%
(196) Pickway (off Nicholasville Rd. south of Man O’ War)
Primary- Newberry 53%, Gray 28%
General- Gray 50.3%, Newberry 49.7%
(129) Indian Hills (off Harrodsburg btwn New Circle & Man O’ War)
Primary- Newberry 54%, Gray 31%
General- Newberry 51%, Gray 49%
(20) Bayswater (south of Indian Hills)
Primary- Newberry 53%, Gray 32%
General- Newberry 52%, Gray 48%
(140) Kittiwake (Man O’ War/Alumni)
Primary- Newberry 50%, Gray 28%
General- Gray 53%, Newberry 47%
(213) Rockminster (around I-75/Winchester Rd.)
Primary- Newberry- 63%, Gray 23%
General- Newberry- 52%, Gray 48%
(8) Ascott (next to Kittiwake)
Primary- Newberry 50%, Gray 30%
General- Gray 55%, Newberry 45%
(188) Palomar (Harrodsburg and Man O’ War)
Primary- Newberry 66%, Gray 24%
General- Newberry 54%, Gray 46%
And there are a lot more just like this. Plus, he took Masterson Station. He took Woodhill. He took Beaumont. He took Shillito Park. He took rural precincts.
He damned well just about took everything, leaving Newberry with only a handful of insignificant wins in the south end.
Anyways, I’m in geek overload right now, so I better stop right there.
Enjoy the maps. And your new mayor.
P.S.- If Steve Beshear or the KDP do not hire Lisa Tanner to do field for them next year (like a certain 0-4 political consultant didn’t), then they deserve whatever is coming to them in 2011.