Andy Barr Raises More $$$ from Financial Industry He Oversees than from the Major City He Represents

no comments
April 17, 2014
By

Sixth District Congressman Garland H. Barr IV raised $361,000 for his campaign in the 1st Quarter of 2014. Barr raised more money in the past month from the financial industry he oversees than he was able to raise over the entire quarter from Lexington, KY — the largest city in his district.

Andy Barr sits on the House Financial Services Committee, the Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee and the Financial Services Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. Since going to Washington, the financial services industry has showered Andy Barr with cash. [link]

Cash from Too Big To Fail Banks. Cash from bailed out institutions, hedge fund profiteers, mortgage pirateers, payday lenders and… other captains of industry and masterminds of economic destruction. 

Last month, we posted about a Wall Street fundraiser for the Barr Campaign in Lower Manhattan [link, link]. The fundraiser was to be hosted by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft — a firm with deep ties to America’s Too Big To Fail financial system, and a firm that’s taken a special interest in the Dodd Frank Wall Street reform law, the Volcker Rule and something called Collateralized Loan Obligations — a way of bundling debt that’s not dissimilar to the Collateralized Debt Obligations that collapsed the American economy. 

Through mid-to-late February and into early March, Congressman Andy Barr was hard at work pushing legislation to protect Wall Street from regulation and their penchant for the largely unregulated C.L.O. market — 70% of which is controlled by the Too Big To Fail Banks that Cadwalader often represents.

In thanks for Barr’s hard work, Cadwalader planned to fete Congressman Andy at their headquarters:

Wall Street Eatin’ Andy for Lunch

That fundraiser, as you see on the invite, was scheduled for March 24th, 2014. On March 22nd, we posted Cadwalader’s invite, the fundraiser details and the background relationship of Cadwalader to Barr.

With the Barr Campaign’s 1Q financials now available, the question is now: How’d Garland Barr do? At first glance, not so great.

BarrFinancial1

Andy Barr flew all the way to NYC, stayed in the Doubletree… and all he got was five grand? That doesn’t seem a very profitable venture. Perhaps the publicity of Cadwalader’s fundraiser for Barr depressed the turnout. Maybe some of the Cadwalader team had second thoughts about pouring money into the Barr campaign so soon after Barr’s push to undo parts of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform Act. Perhaps they were worried about an appearance of quid pro quo campaign giving.

Or… perhaps that five grand is only part of the story.

Combing through the rest of the disclosure, other details of the trip begin to emerge.

There’s a Peter J. Williams of Connecticut who gave $250 on March 24th. His occupation is listed by the FEC as “Information Requested” but there is a Peter J. Williams at Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft.

And then… well, what about other monied interests in the tri-state area around the time of his visit?

BarrFinancial2

Pfizer PAC wrote a big check just days after Barr’s visit. It’s not Barr’s only check from Big PhRMA, but it did come within his NYC window. LSTA, Oakcliff Capital, Berkley Capital, Citi and CVC Credit Partners all have an interest in seeing Barr returned to DC to continue to ‘oversee’ their industry. CIT Group is a leading commercial lender and Morgan Stanley, of course, is Morgan Stanley — their check came in earlier in the month, closer to when Barr was overseeing his latest efforts to re-de-regulate the financial system.

Taking a still wider look at Barr’s 1Q reporting, we find a host of financial interests giving heavily to the Barr campaign — almost half of them in the window around Barr’s Wall Street campaign fundraiser:

BarrFinancial3

The Barr campaign filing does mark a bit of a change for Andy, a sort of financial mainstreaming of his campaign cash. Last summer Barr joined five other Congressmen — all of them on the Financial Services Committee, and all but one of them on the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee — in a Joint Committee that raised nearly $45,000 for the Barr Campaign from a handful of Texas-based payday lenders, hedge funders and the like. [link]

Barr’s 2014 1Q report shows that Texas payday lending spigot hasn’t yet dried up. Cash America International PAC from Fort Worth, TX gave Barr $2,500 on February 13th.

In all — the Barr Campaign brought in at least $62,450 from his Wall Street fundraiser and the financial services industry. All but the $2,500 from Cash America came within the last month. And that total doesn’t include individual donors outside the NYC area — just the Cadwalader folks, their associates, and the financial PACs.

Andy Barr’s Wall Street haul over just the past month is considerably more than Barr was able to raise (just $51,000) over the entire quarter in Lexington, KY — his hometown and the largest city in Kentucky’s 6th District.

With more money flowing from the folks Andy Barr oversees than the ones Andy Barr represents, one has to wonder: Who’s being represented, and who’s being overlooked?

Anthany Beatty: Running for Mayor… or just running interference?

no comments
April 16, 2014
By

Anthany Beatty kicked off his campaign for Mayor last night in grand fashion: there was a mostly empty grand ballroom, a campaign platform copied from another candidate, and a giant banner on the side of a giant campaign RV with the candidate’s own name misspelled.

Oh… and Jim Newberry was there like an anchor to hold the whole campaign ship down.

The event took place at the Embassy Suites. Here’s Beatty’s RV parked outside:

That’s a purty nice RV! When you run a campaign in, say, Iowa or for, like, Governor of Kentucky and you really need to get all around a state, a nice big campaign RV is a great thing. To get around New Circle Road? Even better!

Anthany Beatty is an AnthAny. Like “Any.”

But his awesome RV is adorned (or should I say, “ordorned”) with an awesome banner that features Anthany’s face, the office he’s running for and his campaign website: www.AnthOnyBeattyforMayor.com:

The scene inside the ballroom wasn’t much better — giant space, nobody home:

Oh wait… there’s 20 or so people over in the corner!

Not a great turnout right? Nope! Former Mayor Jim Newberry says that turnout is just terrific!

As for the content of Beatty’s event — what his campaign is all about — Beatty has pegged PR exec Phil Osborne as his campaign manager. Osborne, another Newberry ally, is perhaps most famous for his work as the head of the fake grassroots/astroturf “Faces of Coal” campaign [link].

So to recap so far: Lots of money spent on empty ballroom; lots of money spent on RV; lots of money spent on erroneous banner; lots of money spent on the guy who’s in charge of all that.

Beatty’s platform is also interesting. He says that he wants to be the “Mayor of ALL Lexington”, he says that the interest in downtown development is “elitist” and, in the apparent cornerstone of his campaign,  Beatty says, “Lexington is more than downtown.”

Which is funny because if you visit his website — you know, if you can navigate around his campaign’s attempt to keep you from finding his website, you’ll be greeted by this:

And here’s a screenshot of AnthOnyBeattyForMayor.com:

Osborne’s messaging for Beatty is fascinating. First of all, the notion that Mayor Gray has ignored the rest of Lexington and focused only on downtown Lexington is silly. Either it’s the best Osborne/Beatty/Newberry can do… or it’s a placeholder as they figure out how to run a compelling campaign. Either way — the notion’s easy enough to knock down and is a laughable starting point.

More importantly, the Osborne/Beatty/Newberry campaign platform appears to be simply co-opting the platform of another Mayoral candidate — Danny Mayer. (Note to the Beatty compaign: That’s Mayer with an “e” not an “o”.)

The Mayer for Mayor campaign unveiled its platform two full weeks ago and apparently Beatty and Osborne have been reading up on it — which means they can at least spell one campaign web address correctly: http://lfucmayer.com.

If you read the Herald Leader’s coverage of Beatty’s event last night, and if you’re at all familiar with Mayer’s platform, you can clearly see that Osborne’s chosen campaign strategy hews very closely to the platform of Danny Mayer — the elitism of downtown development, the opposition to Rupp and the convention center, etc.

This morning, the Mayer campaign noted the Beatty campaign’s carbon copying:

So what’s happening here?

For starters, the primary is a month a way. There are three men running: Gray, Mayer, and Beatty. Gray maintains a serious advantage in recognition, popularity, experience, record, expertise and money.

Danny Mayer and Antho/any Beatty will have to run absolutely flawless campaigns in order to win in November, let alone win next month.

The Beatty for Mayor campaign was something of an afterthought. He jumped into the race at the last minute after a months long deliberation that also included former Vice Mayor Mike Scanlon weighing the scales. But to call that a “deliberation” is untrue… it was more like a game of chicken. No one was actually rushing into this decision.

Plenty of people knew that defeating Gray would be a very, very long shot. That’s why no one rushed to enter the race, and that’s why a month from the primary, the most ‘mainstream’ opposition campaign is disorganized. Phil Osborne knows the score and Jim Newberry just wants to settle one. In fact, that’s mostly what the Beatty campaign appears to be about… a cabal of people who lost power trying, in vain, to get it back.

Does Anthany Beatty realize this? Is he one of them, or have they convinced him to use his good name and whatever political power he does have on this race? Is Beatty running for Mayor or simply running interference?

His disorganized and sloppy campaign launch certainly raises that question. And it also raises the question of whether the money Phil Osbarne’s wasted so far should inspire Beatty to keep giving him more of it.

Team Newberry failed miserably while in office and failed miserably on the campaign trail. It’s good to see they’re getting the team back together… but it’s also worth noting that at this point, Danny Mayer’s a far more interesting opposition candidate than Anthany Beatty… in large part because at this point, Anthany Beatty’s just parroting Danny Mayer.

That, friends, is the primary question.

Andy Barr’s $6.7 Billion Vote to Balance Budget on Backs of Kentucky’s Seniors

no comments
April 10, 2014
By

The House of Representatives passed Paul Ryan’s budget this afternoon — barely. Twelve Republicans voted against it (mostly Conservatives who felt Ryan’s cuts weren’t extreme enough). Seven more and it would’ve failed.

6th District Republican Rep. Garland H. Barr IV voted with Ryan and most of the GOP. The budget would get 69% of its ‘savings’ from slashing programs — health care, Medicare, education, etc. — aimed at low and middle income Americans.

The Ryan budget is a gift to Democrats in tight races, and Elisabeth Jensen — Barr’s Democratic opponent here in the 6th — wasted no time:

“It should surprise no one that today Andy Barr once again supported a reckless budget that throws Kentucky’s working families and seniors under the bus. Andy Barr’s budget is a slap in the face that would actually end the Medicare guarantee, turn it into a voucher program, reopen the prescription drug donut hole and make seniors pay more for health care – while lining the pockets of their special interest donors. Kentuckians deserve someone who will fight for their jobs, cut spending the right way and reduce our deficit – but not on the backs of seniors and the middle class,” said Elisabeth Jensen.

Barr’s vote for the Ryan budget is a vote for slashing $6.7 Billion in existing benefits for Kentucky’s seniors.

The AARP says it will “simply increase costs for beneficiaries while removing Medicare’s promise of secure health coverage.”

Balancing the budget by shifting the costs of government to senior citizens on fixed incomes is, essentially, not that much different from a massive tax increase on these Kentuckians. The difference, of course, is that you have to pay your taxes, but with this approach, your grandmother has the “free market choice” to simply not pay for her prescriptions that she can longer afford and then possibly die… which, Andy Barr and Paul Ryan must realize, is also an effective way of lowering the cost of America’s “entitlement” programs.

 

In Video, McConnell Calls for Aggregate Limits & End to PACs

no comments
April 9, 2014
By

Last week the Supreme Court threw open the doors to even more money in politics. The McCutcheon decision eliminates aggregate campaign donation limits (previously set at $123,000). It builds on the Citizens United decision making it still easier for super wealthy individuals and interests to purchase elected offices.

The lawyers representing McCutheon cited, among the top reasons for their victory, the amicus brief of Mitch McConnell, which they called “extraordinarily helpful.” [link]

McConnell has a long history with campaign finance — early in his career he began to focus on the issue and once in the Senate made it his central expertise. (He’s led 20 filibusters to stop various campaign finance bills). This work to loosen the bowels of the big money sphincter helped propel McConnell to the Republican minority leadership. Last week’s Supreme Court decision has been hailed as “McConnell’s Triumph.” [link]

Over his now almost 30 year Senate career, McConnell’s views on campaign finance have changed in some considerable ways.

  • Once upon a time, McConnell was opposed to “dark money.”
  • Once upon a time, McConnell was in favor of shutting out Super PACs.
  • Once upon a time, McConnell was even in favor of aggregate limits.

As McConnell’s views have ‘evolved’, so too have the dynamics of the American electorate — and looking forward, those changes are likely to continue. As demographics swing, voting patterns are likely to go with them, making massive amounts of campaign money even more important to controlling elections. We all have one vote, but we don’t all have a million (or a billion) dollars.

In the video below, Mitch McConnell says, “He who crafts the rules, controls the game.” And right now, Mitch McConnell is clearly crafting the rules.

See Also:

By the Numbers:
  • Mitch McConnell currently trails his Democratic opponent, with a new poll affirming the previous ones, putting Grimes 1% point ahead. [link]
  • Mitch McConnell is less popular than President Obama in the state of Kentucky. [link]
  • Eight in ten of voters were opposed to the Citizens United decision — 85% of Democrats, 76% of Republicans and 81% of independents. [link]
  • Just 16% of Americans believe limits on total contributions to candidates are a violation of free speech rights, and 64% say they are not. [link]
  • Half of all Americans support publicly financed elections. [link]
  • 58% of Americans says we need new campaign finance laws. [link]
  • 60% of Americans wouls support “a federal law that imposes tough, new campaign finance laws for politicians, lobbyists and super PACs.” And 72% would support “tough, new anti-corruption laws.” [link]

***

“I’ve worked in the private sector and I’ve worked in the government, and the most honest, most intelligent, most hard working people I’ve ever met, have been people here. Politicians.” –Mitch McConnell. [link]

Cock Fight: Horse Torturing McConnell crew celebrates Humane Society’s Bevin statement?

4 comments
April 4, 2014
By

 

Team Mitch is in an excited tizzy because the Humane Society has called on Matt Bevin to quit the race for attending a cockfight… one day after the Humane Society blasted McConnell for defending horse torturers. And then both Bevin and McConnell used the exact same rationale to defend their defense of animal torture. Here’s how it happened:

Kentucky Republican Senate candidate Matt Bevin went to a States’ Rights rally that was also a cockfighting event — beefy men adorn hapless birds with stick-on metal nails and hollar while them birds claw each other to death — and that got Matt Bevin in trouble.

The Humane Society put out this statement.

Organized criminals want to repeal Kentucky’s already weak anti-cockfighting statute. We have plenty of evidence that they are brazenly breaking the law, strapping razor-sharp knives and icepick-like gaffs to the legs of roosters, throwing them into a pit and forcing them to hack each other to pieces—just so they can shout out bets and be titillated by the violence and bloodletting.

Bevin’s claims about not knowing ring hollow, as he is now parroting the language of anyone who defends animal cruelty but masks their true intent by speaking of “states’ rights.” His campaign spokesperson told the Lexington Herald-Leader his position on cockfighting: “Matt doesn’t believe this is a federal issue, and the state government can handle it.”

The Humane Society went on to call for Bevin’s withdrawal from the race. That got the McConnell camp very excited.

Here are a couple tweets from McConnell adviser Josh Holmes and one from his spokeswoman, Allison Moore:

Problem is… Team Mitch’s sudden interest in protecting helpless animals is disingenuous at best.

One day before the Humane Society addressed Bevin’s fowl transgression, the exact same Humane Society blasted McConnell for sponsoring legislation that will codify — and make worse — horse torture and put horse torturers in charge of torturing more helpless horses.

Since Holmes, Moore and the rest of the McConnell camp failed to tweet it out, here’s that statement from the Humane Society:

Federal legislation introduced by Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-TN, with Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-KY, Rand Paul, R–KY, and Johnny Isakson, R-GA, as original cosponsors, would weaken protections for horses under the federal Horse Protection Act by placing enforcement authority in the hands of individuals with ties to the Tennessee walking horse industry. This would codify – and actually make worse – a scheme of self-regulation that the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Office of the Inspector General called a failure and recommended be abolished. The bill, S. 2193, is intended as a companion to H.R. 4098, which was introduced in February by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-TN, and has been widely condemned by the horse industry, veterinary community and animal welfare groups.

Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States, said: “[McConnell's] new bill will do nothing to end soring of Tennessee walking horses. It amounts to a prescription for continued abuse of horses by the ‘Big Lick’ faction of trainers who seek to gain an advantage in competitive shows by intentionally injuring the animals. It puts a criminal faction of the industry in control of oversight.”

So… for those of you keeping score:

  • Team Mitch is endorsing the views of the Humane Society.
  • The Humane Society says Matt Bevin is courting an animal cruelty industry run by “organized criminals”
  • The Humane Society says Mitch McConnell is seeking to defend and protect an animal cruelty industry run by “a criminal faction.”
  • In defending his defense of cockfighting, Matt Bevin said it was part of our heritage because the founding fathers did it. [link]
  • In defending his defense of horse soring, Mitch McConnell said it was “a century-old tradition.” [link]

***Note to Matt & Mitch: One century ago, women couldn’t vote. Our founding fathers were active participants in slavery.***

If we’re going by the views of the Humane Society, it seems like both these men should quit the race.

 

#MitchTake: Mitch McConnell reacts to Duke’s Christian Laettner hitting “The Shot” (Video)

no comments
March 27, 2014
By

Last night on the Tonight Show, Jimmy Fallon jabbed Mitch McConnell over his Duke-themed campaign ad (see it here). The far larger problem for the McConnell campaign has come from another late night source, The Daily Show.

The Daily Show the other night added to their quiver of #McConnelling videos with #MeConnelling, #MitchTakes and #McConnellhey videos. Watch:

So… Mitch McConnell’s #MitchTake reaction to his beloved Duke Blue Devils and Christian Laettner hitting “The Shot” over the Kentucky Wildcats:

And here’s Matthew McConaughey explaining that from the fourth dimension, Mitch McConnell — viewed here in 3D — is actually a flat circle (or a crushed beer can):

And if you missed it earlier this week, the first #McConnelling Duke video:

SUPPORT THE YONDER

Archives

Search

Social Networking Crap

Shop at the Barefoot and Progressive Store!

Free Ad Space

Help support B&P! DONATE!

Free Ad Space

Share Barefoot & progressive